A lot of talk about how to monetize a feed reader product. people want to insert google ad sense.
If I were going to launch a competitor to
FeedBurner, here`s how I`d do it.
First, I`d either do a deal with a registrar,
become a registrar, or merge or partner with one.
It`s absolutely essential that the user own the
domain that their feed is hosted at, so that, in
case of emergency, they can switch to a different
hosting service. If they don`t own the domain, it
doesn`t matter how many promises the vendor makes,
or how well-intentioned they are, an act of god
could result in a blackout of a huge portion of the
RSS network. It`s irresponsible to host a large
percentage of the net`s RSS feeds at one domain. I
would set it up so it`s the other way around. My
hosting service won`t host your feed unless you own
the domain.
Further, it would have to be very easy to set up,
that`s why we`d bake in the registrar
functionality. We`d even suggest a domain name if
you can`t think of one, something like
oe913qvijj.com or zeu5ba5wv.org.
The reason this works is that the domain name
system has already been set up so that one
registrar can take over the registration of a
domain. No need to invent a new system. Your feed
goes where ever you want, whenever you want.
Then, once you have a domain registered, you can
check a box (which would be on, by default) that
allows us to host your feed for you. Sorry, you
will have to pay something like $7 a year for the
hosting service, but you get to act like a
customer, and we will treat you like one.
Further, I`d allow readers to become customers too.
When they subscribe to one of the feeds we host, if
they`re willing to pay a flat fee, we`ll eliminate
the ads in the feeds we serve them, and share the
revenue with the people who author the feeds. I
don`t really like ads myself, so I`d pay the fee,
happily. Some people want to put ads in their
feeds, and for them, we`d offer a competitive
price, with the added advantage that we allow
readers to not have to see the ads if they`re
willing to pay to not have to.
It`s a little bit more complicated, but it`s a
sustainable business. When FeedBurner`s users are
up in arms when some media conglomerate has bought
them out and is starting to redirect their feeds to
Viacom and Fox properties, or inserting their own
content alongside yours, like adding a idiotic
liberal bedwetter post alongside your rant about
immigration policy, or generally messing around
with your ideas, we`ll be above it, because you`ll
be able to opt out of our system any time you want.
We won`t be able to screw with you, because you`ll
be able to switch, easily, without our help. (If
you`ve ever tried to get off AOL, you know why
that`s so important.)
Disclaimer: I`m not starting such a service, this
is just to illustrate a point. But...