Response to the Carry trade article from yesterday.
I read your carry trade article but unfortunately
I'm still scratching my head a bit. I think it
would help if you explained what the economists
call 'the transmission mechanism' of central banks.
My understanding of how it works is this: The Fed
wishes to keep interest rates low, therefore they
need to 'add reserves' to the banking system to
increase the supply of deposits, thus banks don't
have to pay depositors as much interest as they
otherwise would and can therefore lend at lower
interest rates. So they go ahead and buy U.S.
treasury bonds from the banks with printed money.
That printed money winds up as a deposit in the
banking system, and banks need to lend it in order
to earn some interest. They lend it to a consumer,
who then buys imports from abroad, call it Asia.
The next part is where i get confused.
Say a Chinese manufacturer now has the dollars from
their sale to the US consumer, who borrowed it from
the bank, who received it as a deposit from the
seller of the US Treasury Bond to the Fed, who
printed the money out of thin air. The manufacturer
must pay some of his expenses in Chinese Yuan, so
he goes to his friendly People's Republic Bank of
China to exchange some U.S. Dollars for local
currency. The PRBoC realizes that a sale of U.S.
Dollars to purchase local currency (Yuan) would
cause the Yuan to appreciated against the dollar,
which of course they wish to prevent because they
are maintaining a 'cheap currency' vis-a-vis the
dollar. They intervene by buying the Dollars with,
I assume, printed Yuan. Those Dollars are now in
the hands of the Chinese Central Bank and rather
than sit on them, they choose to buy some U.S.
Treasury bonds to earn some interest. Thus the
printed dollars recycle into the U.S. economy.
Now, just to review, the printed dollars went from:
The Fed who printed --> Commercial Bank who
received the deposit --> U.S. Consumer as a loan
--> Chinese Manufacturer as a purchase payment -->
Chinese Central Bank as currency intervention -->
U.S. Treasury Market as an investment --> Federal
Government as a deficit spender.
Wouldn't this have the effect of causing inflation
in the U.S. as well as China (both Central Banks
have to print currency to execute the round trip)?
And in addition, since the dollars ultimately come
back into the U.S. economy as purchases of Treasury
bonds issued by the U.S., how is this considered
'dollar sterilization?' As if the dollars were
exported, mopped up by a foreign central bank,
never to return.
Thus, when and if the PRBoC were to sell its U.S.
Treasuries, wouldn't that result in big foreign
DEMAND for dollars, thus a decline in U.S.
liquidity and a sharp appreciation of the Yuan
against the dollar?
Confused,
Minyan Damien
MD,
The only thing I found incorrect with your analysis
is the word "DEMAND" about dollars, although the
conclusion is correct. If the Bank of China sold
its U.S. securities it would cause a rapid
appreciation of the Yuan against the dollar
precisely because of a sudden SUPPLY of dollars. If
no one wants dollars, U.S. rates would have to rise
rapidly to soak them up and liquidity would drop
precipitously.
And yes, this whole process of printing causes
inflation, the creation of credit. The world's
central banks are vehemently trying to create more
credit against the deflationary weight of too much
already out there.
-Succo